Parental Screen Use and Effect on Children – Association of Parental and Contextual Stressors With Child Screen Exposure and Child Screen Exposure Combined With Feeding

Key Points

Question  Are individual and contextual stressors associated with the use and duration of screen time and screen time combined with food in children aged 7 to 18 months?

Findings  In this cross-sectional, population-based study of 1085 children, higher levels of parenting stress and lower household income were associated with increased child screen exposure, whereas higher parenting stress levels and older child age, but not income, were associated with child screen exposure. Only lower household income was associated with increased child screen exposure with feeding, whereas both lower household income and older child age were associated with child screen exposure with feeding.

Meaning  Findings of this study suggest that individual stressors, including higher parenting stress, and contextual stressors, including lower household income, were associated with pervasive screen exposure variables in children aged 7 to 18 months.


Importance  Parents may use screen exposure or screen exposure combined with feeding for infants and toddlers to alleviate their own stress.

Objective  To evaluate the association of individual and contextual stressors with child screen exposure (CSE) and CSE combined with feeding (CSE+F) in children aged 7 to 18 months as measured by parent-reported use and variation in quantity of CSE and CSE+F.

Design, Setting, and Participants  This cross-sectional, population-based study drew parent-child participants from TARGet Kids, a network of primary health care research settings throughout Toronto, Ontario, Canada, between November 1, 2011, and July 31, 2018. The included children were aged 7 to 18 months. Exclusion criteria were health conditions affecting growth, acute conditions, chronic conditions, severe developmental delay, and families who were unable to communicate in the English language. Data were analyzed from April 1, 2019, to July 31, 2019.

Exposures  Parenting stress, child age, child negative affectivity, family living arrangements, and family income were assessed with parent-completed questionnaires.

Main Outcomes and Measures  The primary outcome was CSE and the variation in CSE, which represented the amount of background and engaged use of screens (television, videos or DVDs, video games, computers, and mobile devices) in a typical week. The secondary outcome was CSE+F, which represented the frequency of breakfast, lunch, dinner, and snack consumption during screen exposure in a typical week. Both CSE and CSE+F were assessed with the parent-completed Nutrition and Health Questionnaire; Infant Behavior Questionnaire, Revised Very Short; and Parenting Stress Index, Short Form.

Results  The final sample size was 1085 children for the analysis of CSE and 1083 children for the analysis of CSE+F. Among 914 respondents, the children’s mean (SD) age was 11.6 (2.3) months, and 478 (52.3%) were male. Among 910 respondents, 839 (92.2%) were mothers, with a mean (SD) age among 873 respondents of 34.4 (4.2) years. In a typical week, 581 of 779 children (74.6%) were reported to have any CSE, and 321 of 874 children (36.7%) had some CSE+F. Higher parenting stress levels (odds ratio [OR], 1.01; 95% CI, 1.00-1.02; P = .04) and older child age (OR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.01-2.03; P = .04) were associated with CSE. Higher parenting stress levels (incidence rate [IR], 1.00; 95% CI, 1.00-1.01; P = .002) and lower household income (IR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.10-1.45; P = .01) were associated with increased CSE. Older child age (OR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.35-2.38; P < .001) and lower household income (OR, 2.54; 95% CI, 1.72-3.74; P < .001) were associated with CSE+F. Lower household income (IR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.03-1.42; P = .02) was associated with increased CSE+F.

Conclusions and Relevance  This study found that parenting stress, income, and child age were associated with CSE, and child age and household income were associated with CSE+F. Given these findings, interventions to improve parental coping mechanisms may decrease child screen exposure.

Read the Research




Hintz-Zambrano  K. 10 Moms on their screen time rules & reality. Published July 17, 2017. Accessed March 28, 2018.


Lauricella  AR, Wartella  E, Rideout  VJ.  Young children’s screen time: the complex role of parent and child factors.  J Appl Dev Psychol. 2015;36:11-17. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2014.12.001Google ScholarCrossref


Dunton  GF, Ke  W, Dzubur  E, O’Connor  SG, Lopez  NV, Margolin  G.  Within-subject effects of stress on weight-related parenting practices in mothers: an ecological momentary assessment study.  Ann Behav Med. 2019;53(5):415-425. doi:10.1093/abm/kay053PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref


Jordan  AB, Hersey  JC, McDivitt  JA, Heitzler  CD.  Reducing children’s television-viewing time: a qualitative study of parents and their children.  Pediatrics. 2006;118(5):e1303-e1310. doi:10.1542/peds.2006-0732PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref


McClure  E, Barr  R. Building family relationships from a distance: supporting connections with babies and toddlers using video and video chat. In: Barr  R, Linebarger  DN, eds.  Media Exposure During Infancy and Early Childhood: The Effects of Content and Context on Learning and Development. New York, NY: Springer International Publishing; 2017:227–248. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-45102-2_15


Brown  A, Shifrin  DL, Hill  DL. Beyond ‘turn it off’: how to advise families on media use. Paper presented at: Growing Up Digital: Media Research Symposium; October 1, 2015; Rosemont, IL.


Chen  B, van Dam  RM, Tan  CS,  et al.  Screen viewing behavior and sleep duration among children aged 2 and below.  BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):59. doi:10.1186/s12889-018-6385-6PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref


Christakis  DA.  Interactive media use at younger than the age of 2 years: time to rethink the American Academy of Pediatrics guideline?  JAMA Pediatr. 2014;168(5):399-400. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.5081
ArticlePubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref


Myers  LJ, Keyser  H, Cors  M.  Co-viewers support participation in video chat interactions, but live experiences promote richer word learning for 24-to 36-month-olds in the USA.  J Child Media. 2019;13(4):415-432. doi:10.1080/17482798.2019.1646294Google ScholarCrossref


Myers  LJ, LeWitt  RB, Gallo  RE, Maselli  NM.  Baby FaceTime: can toddlers learn from online video chat?  Dev Sci. 2017;20(4). doi:10.1111/desc.12430PubMedGoogle Scholar


Troseth  GL, Strouse  GA, Verdine  BN, Saylor  MM.  Let’s chat: on-screen social responsiveness is not sufficient to support toddlers’ word learning from video.  Front Psychol. 2018;9:2195. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02195PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref


Madigan  S, Browne  D, Racine  N, Mori  C, Tough  S.  Association between screen time and children’s performance on a developmental screening test.  JAMA Pediatr. 2019;173(3):244-250. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.5056
ArticlePubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref


Mundy  LK, Canterford  L, Olds  T, Allen  NB, Patton  GC.  The association between electronic media and emotional and behavioral problems in late childhood.  Acad Pediatr. 2017;17(6):620-624. doi:10.1016/j.acap.2016.12.014PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref


Chonchaiya  W, Pruksananonda  C.  Television viewing associates with delayed language development.  Acta Paediatr. 2008;97(7):977-982. doi:10.1111/j.1651-2227.2008.00831.xPubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref


Wen  LM, Baur  LA, Rissel  C, Xu  H, Simpson  JM.  Correlates of body mass index and overweight and obesity of children aged 2 years: findings from the healthy beginnings trial.  Obesity (Silver Spring). 2014;22(7):1723-1730. doi:10.1002/oby.20700PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref


Duch  H, Fisher  EM, Ensari  I, Harrington  A.  Screen time use in children under 3 years old: a systematic review of correlates.  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013;10:102-112. doi:10.1186/1479-5868-10-102PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref


Chiu  YC, Li  YF, Wu  WC, Chiang  TL.  The amount of television that infants and their parents watched influenced children’s viewing habits when they got older.  Acta Paediatr. 2017;106(6):984-990. doi:10.1111/apa.13771PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref


Thimmig  LM, Cabana  MD, Bentz  MG,  et al.  Television during meals in the first 4 years of life.  Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2017;56(7):659-666. doi:10.1177/0009922816678585PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref


Pempek  TA, McDaniel  BT.  Young children’s tablet use and associations with maternal well-being.  J Child Fam Stud. 2016;25(8):2636-2647. doi:10.1007/s10826-016-0413-xGoogle ScholarCrossref


Jago  R, Sebire  SJ, Edwards  MJ, Thompson  JL.  Parental TV viewing, parental self-efficacy, media equipment and TV viewing among preschool children.  Eur J Pediatr. 2013;172(11):1543-1545. doi:10.1007/s00431-013-2077-5PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref


Goh  SN, Teh  LH, Tay  WR,  et al.  Sociodemographic, home environment and parental influences on total and device-specific screen viewing in children aged 2 years and below: an observational study.  BMJ Open. 2016;6(1):e009113. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009113PubMedGoogle Scholar


Thompson  DA, Christakis  DA.  The association of maternal mental distress with television viewing in children under 3 years old.  Ambul Pediatr. 2007;7(1):32-37. doi:10.1016/j.ambp.2006.09.007PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref


Radesky  JS, Silverstein  M, Zuckerman  B, Christakis  DA.  Infant self-regulation and early childhood media exposure.  Pediatrics. 2014;133(5):e1172-e1178. doi:10.1542/peds.2013-2367PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref


Avery  A, Anderson  C, McCullough  F.  Associations between children’s diet quality and watching television during meal or snack consumption: a systematic review.  Matern Child Nutr. 2017;13(4):e12428. doi:10.1111/mcn.12428PubMedGoogle Scholar


Gingras  V, Rifas-Shiman  SL, Taveras  EM, Oken  E, Hivert  M-F.  Dietary behaviors throughout childhood are associated with adiposity and estimated insulin resistance in early adolescence: a longitudinal study.  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018;15(1):129. doi:10.1186/s12966-018-0759-0PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref


Thompson  AL, Adair  LS, Bentley  ME.  Maternal characteristics and perception of temperament associated with infant TV exposure.  Pediatrics. 2013;131(2):e390-e397. doi:10.1542/peds.2012-1224PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref


Domoff  SE, Lumeng  JC, Kaciroti  N, Miller  AL.  Early childhood risk factors for mealtime TV exposure and engagement in low-income families.  Acad Pediatr. 2017;17(4):411-415. doi:10.1016/j.acap.2016.12.003PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref


Radesky  JS, Kistin  C, Eisenberg  S,  et al.  Parent perspectives on their mobile technology use: the excitement and exhaustion of parenting while connected.  J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2016;37(9):694-701. doi:10.1097/DBP.0000000000000357PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref


Tremblay  MS, Leblanc  AG, Carson  V,  et al; Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology.  Canadian physical activity guidelines for the early years (aged 0-4 years).  Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2012;37(2):345-369. doi:10.1139/h2012-018PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref


Aftosmes-Tobio  A, Ganter  C, Gicevic  S,  et al.  A systematic review of media parenting in the context of childhood obesity research.  BMC Public Health. 2016;16:320. doi:10.1186/s12889-016-2981-5PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref


von Elm  E, Altman  DG, Egger  M, Pocock  SJ, Gøtzsche  PC, Vandenbroucke  JP; STROBE Initiative.  The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.  Ann Intern Med. 2007;147(8):573-577. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-147-8-200710160-00010PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref


Carsley  S, Borkhoff  CM, Maguire  JL,  et al; Target Kids! Collaboration.  Cohort profile: The Applied Research Group for Kids (Target Kids!).  Int J Epidemiol. 2015;44(3):776-788. doi:10.1093/ije/dyu123PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref


Gartstein  MA, Rothbart  MK.  Studying infant temperament via the Revised Infant Behavior Questionnaire.  Infant Behav Dev. 2003;26(1):64-86. doi:10.1016/S0163-6383(02)00169-8Google ScholarCrossref


The National Child Traumatic Stress Network. Parenting Stress Index, Short Form. Published 1995. Accessed December 6, 2017.


Field  A, Miles  J, Field  Z.  Discovering Statistics Using R. London, UK: Sage Publications Ltd; 2012.


ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis [computer program]. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 2009.


mice: Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations [computer program]. Version 3.7.0. Comprehensive R Archive Network. Published March 7, 2019. Accessed April 1, 2019.


Von Hippel  PT.  How to impute interactions, squares, and other transformed variables.  Sociol Methodol. 2009;39(1):265-291. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9531.2009.01215.xGoogle ScholarCrossref


Gottschall  AC, West  SG, Enders  CK.  A comparison of item-level and scale-level multiple imputation for questionnaire batteries.  Multivariate Behav Res. 2012;47(1):1-25. doi:10.1080/00273171.2012.640589Google ScholarCrossref


Vink  G. miceVignettes. Accessed March 25, 2019.


pwr: Basic functions for power analysis [computer program]. Version 1.2-22018. Published March 3, 2018. Accessed April 1, 2019.


Kabali  HK, Irigoyen  MM, Nunez-Davis  R,  et al.  Exposure and use of mobile media devices by young children.  Pediatrics. 2015;136(6):1044-1050. doi:10.1542/peds.2015-2151PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref


Chen  W, Adler  JL.  Assessment of screen exposure in young children, 1997 to 2014.  JAMA Pediatr. 2019;173(4):391-393. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.5546
ArticlePubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref


O’Connor  SG, Maher  JP, Belcher  BR,  et al.  Associations of maternal stress with children’s weight-related behaviours: a systematic literature review.  Obes Rev. 2017;18(5):514-525. doi:10.1111/obr.12522PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref


Tombeau Cost  K, Jonas  W, Unternaehrer  E,  et al.  Maternal perceptions of paternal investment are associated with relationship satisfaction and breastfeeding duration in humans.  J Fam Psychol. 2018;32(8):1025-1035. doi:10.1037/fam0000468PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref


Walton  K, Simpson  JR, Darlington  G, Haines  J.  Parenting stress: a cross-sectional analysis of associations with childhood obesity, physical activity, and TV viewing.  BMC Pediatr. 2014;14:244. doi:10.1186/1471-2431-14-244PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref


Fox  Z. The 15 countries with the highest smartphone penetration. Published August 27, 2013. Accessed May 29, 2019.


Hardy  I. 86 Percent of Canadians own a smartphone, says CTA report. Published November 5, 2018. Accessed May 29, 2019.


Gentzkow  M, Shapiro  JM.  Preschool television viewing and adolescent test scores: historical evidence from the Coleman study.  Q J Econ. 2008;123(1):279-323. doi:10.1162/qjec.2008.123.1.279Google ScholarCrossref


Hartas  D.  Assessing the foundational studies on adverse childhood experiences.  Soc Policy Soc. 2019;18(3):435-443. doi:10.1017/S1474746419000034Google ScholarCrossref


Kurl  S, Korzinski  D, Holliday  I. What does poverty look like in Canada? survey finds one-in-four experience notable economic hardship. Angus Reid Institute. Published July 17, 2018. Accessed July 1, 2019.


Gershoff  ET, Aber  JL, Raver  CC, Lennon  MC.  Income is not enough: incorporating material hardship into models of income associations with parenting and child development.  Child Dev. 2007;78(1):70-95. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.00986.xPubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref


Abelson  RP.  A variance explanation paradox: when a little is a lot.  Psychol Bull. 1985;97(1):129-133. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.97.1.129Google ScholarCrossref